Better Feedback.
Ship the feature. Get the verdict.
Send one link to the users of what you just shipped. BetterFeedback runs short AI chat interviews and returns a verdict — KEEP, FIX, or KILL — with receipts.
below — one example run, start to finish
scene 1 · tuesday, 4:12 pm
CSV export merges.
CI is green. The e2e suite passed. Your agent wrote half the diff and the changelog line wrote itself — a green check before your coffee cools.
Then the other loop opens: did anyone want this? That one still runs on recruiting emails, calendar tetris, and the no-show at 2pm. So you run two interviews a quarter, or none, and ship the rest on gut.
csv-export for dashboard reports
- unit — 214 passed
- e2e — 31 passed
- typecheck — clean
does it work — answered in 4 minutes
did anyone want it — open
why it matters
You've automated the loop for “does it work.” For “did anyone want it,” you've got a voicemail.
No calendar. No call to book. Just a link.
scene 2 · thursday, 9:41 am
A user clicks the link.
No booking link. No “got 30 minutes this week?” The chat says it's AI up front and asks consent before a word is kept. Two questions in, the user types the sentence no dashboard would ever surface — and the next question chases it.
AI interview · consent asked first · skip anytime
the follow-up came from the answer, not a script
scene 3 · friday, 11:06 am
Example run: seven sessions in. Two don't count.
In this example run, quotes stack up — and two sessions end before they count. One ends after “qwe rty zxc.” One after “hi.” The quality gate throws both out: out of the denominator, off your bill. Five quality-completed interviews remain, and one of them liked the export fine. That stays in the file too — a verdict you can't argue with is a verdict you can't trust.
- session_01
“The file stopped at ten thousand rows and never warned me.”
hit the wall - session_02
“I re-ran the export three times before I realized rows were missing.”
hit the wall - session_03
qwe rty zxc
abandoned · excluded · never billed - session_04
“Exported about four thousand rows. Worked great.”
counterevidence · stays in - session_05
“I stopped trusting the numbers and rebuilt the report by hand.”
hit the wall - session_06
“hi”
abandoned · excluded · never billed - session_07
“Never exported anything that big. No complaints.”
counterevidence · stays in
claim · under review
Exports silently truncate at 10,000 rows.
- denominator
3 of 5 quality-completed sessions
- confidence
early signal — small n, same wall
- counterevidence
2 of 5 attached. Shown, not deleted.
- source
every claim pinned to a transcript span
verified — claims without receipts don't ship
Think CI for conclusions: the AI proposes, a deterministic verifier checks the math, and anything without evidence is blocked. Have a follow-up? Ask the evidence — answers come back with citations to real transcripts.
final scene · friday, 4:58 pm
The verdict comes back.
example run · csv export · friday 4:58 pm
CSV Export
Verdict: FIX3 of 5 quality-completed interviews hit the same wall
wall #1 silent truncation at 10,000 rows
attached counterevidence · every quote linked to its transcript
Stamped in red, because red means decide. Not a sentiment score. Not a word cloud. A ruling with the math to defend it. Your users said it — BetterFeedback shows the receipts.
The next roadmap fight ends with a verdict.
Free to start. One active run and ten chat interviews a month. No card.
your feature name here